Archive for the ‘EDU 6160’ Category

For EDU 6160, my classmates and I constructed a Problem-Based Learning Model based on the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

http://sites.google.com/site/pblmodelbywekidalot/

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

This is a lesson plan I constructed for EDU 6160.  The main learning activity is reconstructing maps of the area around Gettyburg, Pennsylvania for a deeper understanding of the battle that took place there.  It also contains a description and discussion of the formative and summative assessments that I included in the lesson.

EDU 6160- Lesson Plan

Read Full Post »

This my final paper for EDU 6160.  It describes and discusses several assessment methods focusing on Formative Assessment concepts.

EDU 6160- Final Methods Paper

Read Full Post »

Advances in technology continually provide new opportunities for learning experiences in the classroom. It is an important responsibility of the teacher to be aware of new technologies and what is available for them to use. Among the new technologies available to teachers today are web-based testing, automated scoring, Google documents, survey sites, access to grades and projects online, and assessment assistance websites for rubric creation. Technological proficiency is becoming an important part of any school curriculum. As students gain access to more computers in the classroom, the dynamics of the classroom change with the integration of new technologies. Assessment is effected specifically through a change in the way information is collected. With summative assessments, student work is graded by a program and the scores are reported with suggestions for improvement. With formative assessment, teachers are given extra opportunities to check student comprehension through the use of survey programs and others that assess student understanding in a fun, engaging way. As Shermis and DiVesta (2011) write, specifically about technology’s effect on assessment, “One of the advantages of using computer-based technologies is that they, unlike large-scale standardized tests, are easily amenable to classroom adaptation. The challenge is simply trying to keep abreast of all of the innovations that can help you perform assessments” (Kindle Locations 6613-6615).

Reference:
Shermis, M. & DiVesta, F. (2011). Classroom Assessment in Action. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.. Kindle Edition.

Read Full Post »

Academic achievement in the classroom is dependent on several factors: attainable goals and objectives clearly stated, multiple formal and informal formative assessment practices to monitor student progress, expectable summative assessments based on unit content, and multiple opportunities for self-reflection on progress. In order for these factors to mesh into successful instruction, there must be continuing student motivation for achievement. This is maintained and encouraged by the teacher through demeanor and attitude towards the students in addition to a carefully constructed formative assessment program that allows the students to be aware of their progress toward completing the objectives. As Shermis and DiVesta (2011) write, “Feedback about student performance, as an indicator of instructional effectiveness, is a critical part of formative assessment. To be optimally useful, teachers and students interact to communicate their interpretation of grades, scores, or other measures. Such conversations provide a basis for understanding what has been accomplished and how much progress has been made toward the achievement of instructional goals” (Kindle Locations 2460-2463). Continuing conversations between the teacher and students about their progress and a general attitude toward formative assessments that understands their constructive and supportive nature will be helpful in the encouragement of students toward academic success in the classroom.

Reference:
Shermis, M. & DiVesta, F. (2011). Classroom Assessment in Action. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..
Kindle Edition.

Read Full Post »

The flexibility of curriculum is essential to successful learning. No carefully planned unit in any subject will foresee the learning needs of each and every student. It is important that each unit be constructed with the understanding that student needs will necessitate changes.
Changes in curriculum are guided by the results of different forms of formative instruction. Each lesson should be written with several ‘checking in’ components to gauge the students learning and disposition. As Shermis and DiVesta (2011) write, “The idea is that any or all assessments provide a basis for considering retention or change in your approach. With assessments conducted with students and teachers working cooperatively, teachers retain an approach that is producing satisfactory results, revise instruction to improve its effectiveness, or, when the occasion demands it, abandon an instructional component that is ineffective. Monitoring instruction and learning in these ways is intended to have continual effects on the improvement of instruction” (2540-2543). In any unit, students’ prior understanding or lesson effectiveness may require that the teacher spend more time on one aspect of the lesson and less on another. Also, students may need individual instruction on problem areas or might be more successful with content if given an activity that plays to their strongest intelligence. Formative assessment and a detailed understanding of the students allow the teacher to understand when and where these adjustments need to take place.

Reference:
Shermis, M. & DiVesta, F. (2011). Classroom Assessment in Action. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..
Kindle Edition.

Read Full Post »

In order to have an organized curriculum aligned to standards and outcomes where students understand the objectives and are informed of their progress toward meeting them, a teacher must integrate both formative and summative assessments into their curriculum. In order for students to understand where they are in their progress towards meeting standards, there must be informal and formal formative assessments gauging their progress for feedback. This means that the teacher is constantly checking up with their students about what they understand and don’t understand (informal formative) and is constantly assigning projects and written assessments throughout the unit which assess the understanding of the student of content covered (formal formative). These assessments and others are done in the understanding that there will be a formal test (Summative Assessment) at the end of the unit which will assess their completion of the objective and whether or not they have passed state and schools standards for the unit. Curriculum, instruction, and assessment should all be aligned with the learning objective or target for each lesson and students should be made aware what the objectives are for each lesson if they are to be formally assessed of their progress towards and completion of the learning objective. Shermis and DiVesta (2011) in their book Classroom Assessment in Action explain the use of formative and summative assessments in more detail and give extended examples of each (2434-3373).
Reference:
Shermis, M., & DiVesta, F. (2011). Classroom Assessment in Action. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.. Kindle Edition.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »