Archive for February, 2012

This is interview that I did for EDU 6364.  It contains an analysis of two class periods I observed and interviews with the teachers about relevant and important aspects of education.

EDU 6364- Interview Paper

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

For EDU 6160, my classmates and I constructed a Problem-Based Learning Model based on the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

http://sites.google.com/site/pblmodelbywekidalot/

Read Full Post »

This is a lesson plan I constructed for EDU 6160.  The main learning activity is reconstructing maps of the area around Gettyburg, Pennsylvania for a deeper understanding of the battle that took place there.  It also contains a description and discussion of the formative and summative assessments that I included in the lesson.

EDU 6160- Lesson Plan

Read Full Post »

Gary Borich’s analysis of successful teaching practices and perspectives in his book Effective Teaching Methods: Researched Based Practice is extremely detailed, informative, and lengthy. His analysis about what it takes to be a successful and influential teacher is extremely helpful in the process of constructing an accurate perspective of student needs and what makes instruction successful. There is an unfortunate tendency, however, that arises in the attempt to define constructive and effective teaching, that is the defining and cataloging of individuals by the social, environmental, and personal factors that surround them. If we, as teachers, attempt to define students by their environments and by certain observable traits, we do them a great disservice.
Borich’s analysis of the different factors affecting students and instruction is incredible and exemplary. His explanation of the five key factors proven to contribute to effective teaching (Lesson Clarity, Instructional Variety, Teacher Task Orientation, Engagement in the Learning Process, and Student Success Rate) and of the behaviors accompanying effective instruction (Using Student Ideas and Contributions, Structuring, Questioning, Probing, and Teacher Affect) are incredibly informative, accurate, and helpful (pgs. 7- 22). His description of the environmental, social, family, and personality factors that affect student perspectives is accurate and expansive in its breadth. The most helpful part of the chapter is the description of the multiple intelligences of Howard Gardiner and Sternberg’s definition of intelligence (pgs. 48 – 52). Chapter three’s description of objectives and the foundations for objectives is an essential understanding for the creation of lesson plans. Chapter four’s description of vertical (discipline centered) and horizontal (cross discipline) lesson planning is helpful for developing a perspective about how your lessons will fit into a greater curriculum.
Borich in the introduction in chapter one talks about how instruction is more than mastering an understanding of all of the different aspects that can affect the atmosphere and individuals in a classroom. He writes about the key behaviors mentioned above, “…you might think an effective teacher simply is one who has mastered all of the key behaviors and helping behaviors. But teaching involves more than knowledge of how to perform individual behaviors. Much like an artist, who blends color and texture into a painting to produce a coherent impression, so must an effective teacher blend individual behaviors into teaching practices that promote students achievement” (pg. 27). I would take Borich’s assertion one step farther. I would say that effective teaching is more than understanding all of the different factors that may affect or seek to define an individual or classroom. In attempting to understand all of the different ways how students can be different in their needs, abilities, and personalities, my natural tendency (at least) is to start thinking about individuals in terms of their traits, dependencies, and environmental factors, leaving very little room for students to assert their individuality and personality because of or in spite of factors affecting them. My arguments are that 1. it is important and essential to understand how students will have needs and abilities that differ in the classroom so that the teacher can adequately provide resources for them, but 2. that cataloging and defining individuals by visible factors has the effect of creating distance between students and teachers, because students are being analyzed as subjects not as individuals in the learning atmosphere of the classroom.
References:
Borich, G. (2011). Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice (7th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Read Full Post »

This is a description and comparison of Washington State and NCSS Social Studies content standards.

EDU 6150-Content Standards

Read Full Post »

This my final paper for EDU 6160.  It describes and discusses several assessment methods focusing on Formative Assessment concepts.

EDU 6160- Final Methods Paper

Read Full Post »

These are my the Lesson Plan and Presentation that I created for EDU 6150, as well as two commentaries about the lesson that I completed for the class.  Their focus is differing interpretaions of the signing of the Declaration of Independence and analyzing differing accounts for accuracy in historical research.

EDU 6150- Final Lesson Plan

EDU 6150- Final Presentation

EDU 6150- Final Lesson Plan Commentary 2

EDU 6150- Final Lesson Plan Commentary

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »